Christmas visitors

I always tell my friends that they should come and visit me, but invariably I end up living in far away (or, in the case of Ithaca, hard to get to) places and no one (besides one awesome cousin) comes. I'm not the best at visiting people, either: this past weekend I was planning on spending the weekend with my best friend in Boston, only to find that she moved to Colorado two days prior. At least now I have a legitimate reason to go to Colorado. I had also extended an invitation to my friends in Australia, thinking it was even less likely that they would take me up on the offer. However, one of them happens to be stuck in the U.S. on a post-doc with nowhere to go over the holidays so he is flying here to spend the holidays with my family. I know it's a long way from Christmas, but I am really, really excited to get to spend the holidays with him. He and many other people in Australia graciously let me join in on all their family gatherings and excursions and I am really glad to be able to do the same for him. I just have to start planning what cool things we can see while he is here. He's never been to New York City, so I think we will definitely take a train there one day, and there is a ski slope just outside of Ithaca that has really good ski packages (I know it's not exactly the Rockies, but I don't think he has ever been skiing, either). But if anyone has any ideas, I would love to hear them. We will be spending some time outside of Philadelphia with my extended family and some time in Ithaca.

Ugh

I am very excited to watch the presidential debates this Friday, so when I saw the NY Times headline this evening about McCain calling for postponement of both the debates and the campaigns in light of the financial crisis, I was very worried. Of course McCain would want the campaigns to cease now that Sarah Palin's charm has worn off and Obama is gaining back his lead in the polls. I also think Obama will be much more effective than McCain in the debates. Fortunately, I checked back in with the Times a few minutes later and discovered that Obama agreed to suspend his campaign in order to be present in Congress while they decide whether to use 700 billion dollars of our money (another issue in itsef) to 'fix' our financial situation but declined the postponement of the debates.

Now, about those 700 billion dollars. Economics has never been my strong suit. I don't completely understand how the value of businesses and goods are based entirely on what people happen to think they are worth and not some intrinsic value. I also don't entirely understand how our monetary system became unlinked from gold such that we spend our entire lives paying for things with bits of paper that also have no intrinsic value, or how the treasury department 'keeps' their value by rationing how much of them they print. Regardless of the possible fate of our financial system, I don't think that taxpayers should have to support independent banks that are now failing just because they screwed up so badly they are threatening our and possibly the world's fianncial system. If we are going to save them under the auspices of saving the financial system, I think taxpayers should absolutely get a substantial stake in the companies.

On a slightly related topic, while the dollar has drastically dropped against the euro, it has unfortunately not done so against the Australian dollar. It seems that the Australian economy is just to closely linked to ours so that as our dollar has dropped worldwide recently, so has the Australian dollar. I only mention this because I closed the account I used during my year in Australia today. If I had been more on top of things and closed in during the summer, when the exchange rate reached a high of 0.97 AUD to 1 USD, I would be receiving a lot more money than at the current exchange rate of 0.83 AUD to 1 USD. Oh well, I think I better just stick with biology.

big school, small school

I've just started my third week of classes and already the differences between classes here and at my undergraduate school are stark. It's not because I'm taking graduate courses now. In fact, most of the classes I am enrolled in are technically undergrad ones. They are big lectures where half the students don't attend class and a good portion of the other half falls asleep. There is no participation, no discussion. The professors don't even attempt to learn names. With all of our assignments limited to quizzes and exams, it's no wonder why so many science students have difficulty writing. While this different style does mean that there is a lot less work needed per class, I miss the engaged classrooms where students talked to the professor and felt comfortable asking questions and where your professor would call you by name.

Ithaca weather

Here is a clipping of the weather forecast for Freeville tomorrow afternoon, courtesy of wunderground.com. Since when does the National Weather Service forecast a "definite" chance of rain?

luck

for some unknown reason, I have been really, really lucky with all things science this year. Everything I've tried works, or at least works with minor issues. Yesterday, I managed to get a fairly decent western blot from a new antibody that isn't very homologous to my protein (it's only 70% with the recommended minimum is 75%). To add to all that, the antibody was held up in Australian customs for a week without refrigeration, so I really had no idea if it would work at all. And, it even works when it's really diluted (1:50,000) so I don't have to worry about using it all up. All in all, it was a good day.

Translation: a western blot basically allows you to identify proteins. You grind up tissue in a special buffer with things that keep enzymes from destroying your ptoteins. Spin all the non-protein junk down to the bottom of a tube, figure out how much protein you actually have in your tube using a very cool assay that changed from green to purple when it finds protein. Then you load your proteins onto a gel to separate them according to size, transfer all the proteins on the gel laterally onto a membrane using an electrical current, then apply your antibody to your membrane. Unfortunately, you can't see what your antibody is binding to at this point so you have to apply another antibody, called the secondary, that recognizes a little tag on your first antibody. The secondary has its own little tag that can be made to give off light. So you expose your membrane to film and develop it and you have a western. If an antibody is 70% homologous it means that the chunk of your protein that the antibody binds to has 70% of the same amino acids. The more amino acids that are the same, the better the antibody binds.
Now you can all call ourselves molecular biologists. Funny enough, there's also Southern and northern blots. East was left out of the party, but we can save that lesson for another day.

Spamalot and Thanksgiving fun

I almost forgot...after an amazing Thanksgiving lunch with my supervisors and other grad students, a couple of friends and I went across to Melbourne to see Spamalot, which has just started playing. I never got to see in on Broadway, but it was fantastic! It's showing in one of Melbourne's largest theatres, but it was still very small by NY standards. We had awesome seats in the front row of the balcony. I was laughing the whole time, and they even threw in some uniquely Australian moments. The only thing that was not done perfectly was actually funnier as a result. It's very hard for Australians to imitate a French accent so the French characters had an Australian twist to their accent that was fantastic.

A new PM

Well, ir has been an eventful couple of days for Australia. In a landslide victory, we have overthrown the sitting government and elected a new prime minister, Kevin Rudd. It has to be pretty big news if anything related to Australia makes front page of the NY Times. I watched the election coverage on TV saturday night. It was rather amusing. Voting is mandatory in Australia; if you don't do it, you're fined. To circumvent people with excuses like "I don't have time between 8am, and 6pm on Saturday to vote", you can vote at polling booths in the few days preceeding the election, or you can send in your ballot by mail. On the ballot, you number the candidates in order of your preference. If your first preference doesn't win a certain percentage of the votes, your second preference is counted, and so on. This has the very interesting consequence that a vote for a minor party doesn't detract from a major party's ability to win the election.
There was a gradation of silliness on the network channels in terms of election coverage. ABC, the national company, was the most serious; completely lacking such embellishments as cartwheeling cartoons of candidates as parliament seats were won or the 'tower of power': a projection of the number of seats won by each party onto the tallest building in Melbourne. The networks also vastly disagreed on the early outcomes of the election with one channel declaring Kevin Rudd the winner almost two hours before ABC finally caved.
Because Australia has such a relatively small population, the votes get counted very quickly. For many parliament seats, almost 100% of the votes were counted just 2 hours after the polls closed. It definitely made for much more exciting election coverage.
I'm off to a conference in Perth toward the end of this week and from that point onward life becomes really exciting for a while. First, seeing Perth will be amazing because it's a completely different side (literally) from Australia and I'm excited to present at my first conference. Only a few days after I get back, Becca arrives and we begin a several-week long adventure around Australia and New Zealand (since she convinced me to see NZ with her as well). I am sooooo excited, although from the looks of it the NZ part of the trip is much better planned than the Australian part. I think we will get on alright, though and have some awesome adventures on the great barrier reef and in the outback.